000 02627nam a2200193 4500
005 20241219163038.0
008 241219b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aMAIN
041 _aEng
110 _aPoppelreuter,Tanja
_963440
245 _aSocial Individualism:
_bWalter Gropius and his Appropriation of Franz Müller-Lyer's Idea of a New Man /
_cTanja Poppelreuter
260 _aOxford:
_bOxford University Press,
_c2011.
300 _aVolume 24, Issue 1, March 2011, (37–58 p.)
520 _aIn 1929, Walter Gropius developed the ‘High-Rise Steel Frame Apartment Building’ that was based on theories about the emergence of a New Man put forward by sociologist Franz Müller-Lyer. In his lecture at the Congrès International d’Architecture Moderne conference in 1929, Gropius appropriated Müller-Lyer's sociology in order to promote and prompt the re-development of high-rise tenements and master households. Gropius’ 1931 contribution to the Deutsche Bauausstellung in Berlin incorporated a full-scale community lounge and a recreation area with sporting equipment, as well as a model and plans for a ‘High-Rise Steel Frame Apartment Building’ that were designed in accordance with Müller-Lyer's theories. While it shows Müller-Lyer's influence, the boxing equipment found in the recreation area reflects the importance that sport, and boxing in particular, had gained after 1900. Boxing was perceived as a sport that would not only further fitness but also raise the spirits and help the inhabitant to succeed in the modern urban environment. By providing boxing equipment, Müller-Lyer's vision, which envisaged master households as furthering a community of peaceful individuals living in a condition of mutual trust, is weakened. In 1923, the sociologist Helmuth Plessner had regarded utopian visions of ideal communities as antithesis to actual events in the Weimar Republic. The embracing of theories that promised an evolutionary and linear development towards peaceful communities can be regarded as a counterreaction to a present that was perceived as an imperfect and temporary condition. Furthermore, Gropius’ appropriation of Müller-Lyer's sociology not only helped to distinguish his position from Marxist and socialist theories but also illustrated the contemporary tendency to accept utopian ideas while simultaneously doubting the practicality of some.
650 _aModernism
_y19th Century
_zEurope
_963441
773 0 _09229
_913522
_dOxford Oxford University Press
_oJ000329
_tJournal of design history
_x0952-4649
856 _u https://doi.org/10.1093/jdh/epq049
942 _cART
999 _c15352
_d15352