000 01340nab a2200193 4500
003 OSt
005 20231010113717.0
007 cr aa aaaaa
008 231009b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 _aHodgetts, Timothy
_950228
245 _aAnimals’ mobilities/
260 _bSage,
_c2020.
300 _aVol. 44, issue 1, 2020 ( 4–26 p.).
520 _aThis paper draws together animal and mobility studies to develop the concept of animals’ mobilities. It identifies the parallel intellectual interests in these fields that provide the intellectual foundations for this synthesis, in mobility (over movement), affect, relational space, and ordering practices. It explores what configures an animal’s mobility, knowledge practices for researching and evoking animals’ mobilities, and how animals’ mobilities are governed. The conclusion highlights what these fields gain from this synthesis, and identifies the empirical, political and conceptual contributions that this concept makes to geographical research. The argument is illustrated with examples of large, terrestrial mammals, especially bears.
700 _aLorimer, Jamie
_949450
773 0 _012579
_917141
_dLondon: Sage Publication Ltd, 2019.
_tProgress in human geography/
_x 03091325
856 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0309132518817829
942 _2ddc
_cEJR
999 _c14889
_d14889