| 000 | 01398nab a2200181 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20230915105620.0 | ||
| 007 | cr aa aaaaa | ||
| 008 | 230915b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aHuq, Efadul _958027 |
||
| 245 | _aSeeing the insurgent in transformative planning practices/ | ||
| 260 |
_bSage, _c2020. |
||
| 300 | _aVol.19, Issue 4, 2020 (371–391 p.). | ||
| 520 | _aInsurgent planning and radical planning are two of the most popular conceptual frames of reference for progressive planners and theorists of transformative planning practices. In the past decades, scholars have extended these two planning conceptions to new geographies and realities to shed light on how planning can challenge structural injustices and marginalization. However, less attention has been given to how insurgent planning renovates radical planning practices in response to the crisis of neoliberal urbanization. While appreciating that radical and insurgent planning remain braided in practice, this article contributes to the literature on transformative planning by highlighting how insurgent planning builds on radical planning and innovates with regard to social location, epistemic distinction, and analytical unit. | ||
| 773 | 0 |
_08831 _917116 _dLondon Sage Publications Ltd. 2002 _tPlanning theory _x1473-0952 |
|
| 856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219901290 | ||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cEJR |
||
| 999 |
_c14724 _d14724 |
||