000 | 01523nab a2200205 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20230914124012.0 | ||
007 | cr aa aaaaa | ||
008 | 230914b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
100 |
_aDavoudi, Simin _957968 |
||
245 |
_aReinventing planning and planners: _bIdeological decontestations and rhetorical appeals/ |
||
260 |
_bSage, _c2020. |
||
300 | _aVol 19, Issue 1, 2020 : (17–37 p.). | ||
520 | _aThis article contributes to the debate about ideologically motivated planning reforms. It aims to advance the debate by exploring how change is legitimised through forms of rhetorical persuasion. It shows how political ideologies become embedded in planning policies and practices through strategies of legitimation aimed at justifying specific ideas, beliefs and values as self-evident and inevitable. These legitimation strategies rely on distinctive rhetorical appeals to steer planning discourses, policies and institutions. By using short illustrative examples of ‘ideology in action’ from Britain, Denmark and the Netherlands, the article shows that various combinations of rhetorical appeals to logos, ethos, pathos and doxa (logic, character, emotion and identity) are often simultaneously at work to naturalise contested planning reforms. | ||
700 |
_aGalland, Daniel _957969 |
||
700 |
_aStead, Dominic _957970 |
||
773 | 0 |
_08831 _917116 _dLondon Sage Publications Ltd. 2002 _tPlanning theory _x1473-0952 |
|
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219869386 | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cEJR |
||
999 |
_c14688 _d14688 |