000			01980nab a2200205 4500
003			OSt
005			20230910123834.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			230910b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aStehlin, John _957658
245			_aPlatform mobilities and the production of urban space: _bToward a typology of platformization trajectories/
260			_bSage, _c2020.
300			_aVol. 52, Issue 7, 2020 ( 1250–1268 p.)
520			_aThe past decade has seen an explosion in what is popularly known as the “sharing economy,” perhaps most visibly in the realm of transport. Digital “shared mobility” platforms like Uber, Car2Go, and Mobike, as well as emerging, more sophisticated “mobility-as-a-service” platforms which coordinate multiple discrete services into a single portal, have risen to prominence as modes of reworking everyday urban transport in cities of North America, Europe, and East Asia in particular. This paper aims to explore the driving forces and concrete expressions of this platformization of urban mobility, as a particularly diverse and volatile component of a broader platform urbanism. Based on the construction and analysis of a database consisting of 200 urban mobility platforms drawn from across the globe, we highlight five key trajectories of platform formation, focusing on the firms, institutions, and social interests that have fueled the growth of this sector, and the modes of infrastructural organization, spatial formation, and governance that they entail. We further highlight the fragility of this particular form of “spatial fix,” and the prospects for a more redistributive form of platform urbanism. We conclude by reflecting on implications for future research.
700			_aHodson, Michael _957659
700			_aMcMeekin, Andrew _953468
773	0		_08877 _917103 _dLondon Pion Ltd. 2010 _tEnvironment and planning A _x1472-3409
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19896801
942			_2ddc _cEJR
999			_c14545 _d14545