000			01949nab a22002057a 4500
003			OSt
005			20230906172100.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			230906b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aRijken, Bart _957589
245			_aExploring the feasibility of future housing development within existing cities: _bscience-for-policy in the face of complexity and politicisation/
260			_bSage, _c2020.
300			_aVol. 47, Issue 2, 2020, ( 336–351 p.)
520			_aIn cities around the world, housing demand is increasing rapidly. Since housing supply is inelastic, house prices are rising as well, which causes affordability problems. Although there is consensus about the need to raise production, there is debate about its location: within the existing city, on underused or derelict buildings and sites, or on greenfield land outside existing city boundaries? The question we address is how researchers on the science–policy interface can support these debates and facilitate evidence-based decision-making. We address two major problems while doing this: (1) the complexity of the object at hand, that is, of the development of urban systems and (2) the politicised nature of science-for-policy. The contribution of this paper is that it links complexity theory to the literature about science-for-policy, two usually unconnected literatures. An additional contribution is that it shows how the role of the scientist as ‘honest broker’, as developed by Roger Pielke, can be operationalised and applied to existing policy debates. We do that for the Dutch debate about housing development in existing urban areas.
700			_aBuitelaar, Edwin _956620
700			_aDuinen, Lianne Van _957590
773	0		_08876 _917104 _dLondon Pion Ltd. 2010 _tEnvironment and planning B: planning and design (Urban Analytics and City Science) _x1472-3417
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2399808319899689
942			_2ddc _cEJR
999			_c14512 _d14512