000			01916nab a22001937a 4500
003			OSt
005			20230906165516.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			230906b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aRantanen, Annuska _957587
245			_aUrban planning in the post-zoning era: _bFrom hierarchy to self-organisation in the reform of the Finnish Land Use and Building Act/
260			_bSage, _c2020.
300			_aVol. 47, Issue 2, 2020, ( 321–335 p.)
520			_aEncountering cities as complex systems has been pictured as both an intellectual challenge and an urge to reconceptualise planning practices accordingly. Statutory planning in Finland, like in many other European countries, is built on the principles of hierarchical three-level zoning and area reservation codes. The zoning system reflects two historical tasks: the industrialising society’s need to separate uses and the post-war desire for hierarchical administrative structures. Both these demands are rapidly losing their importance. The article focuses on current urban planning practices and planning rules, discussing their limitations to cope with urban complexity and self-organised dynamics, and aiming to develop new rules that could potentially turn complexity into an asset. Evolving digital technologies provide completely new opportunities for developing urban planning into a more transparent and interactive tool. In this framework, we set out to study the development potentials of planning rules in Finland, where the drafting of a new Land Use and Building Act is currently underway calling for a reassessment of the operative role of the planning system.
700			_aRajaniemi, Juho _957588
773	0		_08876 _917104 _dLondon Pion Ltd. 2010 _tEnvironment and planning B: planning and design (Urban Analytics and City Science) _x1472-3417
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2399808319893686
942			_2ddc _cEJR
999			_c14511 _d14511