| 000 | 01689nab a2200181 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20230906164803.0 | ||
| 007 | cr aa aaaaa | ||
| 008 | 230906b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aJ Partanen _957586 |
||
| 245 | _aGuiding urban self-organization: Combining rule-based and case-based planning/ | ||
| 260 |
_bSage, _c2020. |
||
| 300 | _aVol. 47, Issue 2, 2020, ( 304–320 p.) | ||
| 520 | _aIn cities, positive self-organization, reflecting the preferred pattern formation resulting from dissipative decision making of activities, is a key promoter of urban dynamics. The urban planning system is limited in recognizing it, but planners adapt to these autonomous processes by deviating from the plan. The result is a dual system of rules and systematic exceptions, which lacks the ability to steer and evaluate the overall direction of urban progress. Similar yet explicit dual problem-solving procedures of statutory rule frameworks and adaptations applying previous cases are common in many fields. Applying this multi-disciplinary knowledge, I propose a dual, computation-supported planning procedure combining rule-based and case-based reasoning. Such planning could respond to urban self-organization, while guiding urban dynamics in a consistent manner. The operation of this coupled system is illustrated using the empirical example of Lielahti, a mixed-use working place district in the Finnish city of Tampere in an exploratory manner. | ||
| 773 | 0 |
_08876 _917104 _dLondon Pion Ltd. 2010 _tEnvironment and planning B: planning and design (Urban Analytics and City Science) _x1472-3417 |
|
| 856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2399808319893687 | ||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cEJR |
||
| 999 |
_c14510 _d14510 |
||