000 | 01711nab a22002057a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20230906164348.0 | ||
007 | cr aa aaaaa | ||
008 | 230906b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
100 |
_aZhang, Shuhai _957584 |
||
245 |
_aUnderstanding self-organization and formal institutions in peri-urban transformations: _bA case study from Beijing/ |
||
260 |
_bSage, _c2020. |
||
300 | _aVol. 47, Issue 2, 2020, ( 287–303 p.) | ||
520 | _aThis article explores the mechanisms of urban self-organization and the role of formal institutions in shaping peri-urban areas. A case study of Gaobeidian, a former rural village that is now part of Beijing, examines the mechanisms of change and the interdependent relations between institutions and bottom-up initiatives that drive peri-urban transformations. The paper presents two main contributions: (1) it identifies the differences between government-controlled planning, shared governance, self-governance and self-organization and how these intertwine in urban transformations; (2) it proposes three distinct roles played by institutions in relation to self-organization: triggering, constraining and enabling. The empirical study of this Chinese case will enrich the current debate on planning for self-organizing cities by revealing the impact of, and the various responses to, self-organization dynamics in a hierarchical institutional environment. | ||
700 |
_aRoo, Gert De _957585 |
||
700 |
_aRauws, Ward _957570 |
||
773 | 0 |
_08876 _917104 _dLondon Pion Ltd. 2010 _tEnvironment and planning B: planning and design (Urban Analytics and City Science) _x1472-3417 |
|
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2399808319888223 | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cEJR |
||
999 |
_c14509 _d14509 |