000			01492nab a2200205 4500
003			OSt
005			20230906160344.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			230906b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aMoroni, Stefano _948981
245			_aForms of self-organization: Urban complexity and planning implications/
260			_bSage, _c2020.
300			_aVol. 47, Issue 2, 2020, ( 220–234 p.)
520			_aThe implications of self-organizing phenomena for planning strategies and interventions are a relatively new topic of research that is gaining increasing traction with urban planners and the emerging literature. The problem is that the concept of self-organization is at present applied in a variety of different ways in the contemporary planning debate, a fact that has generated misunderstandings, dubious definitions, and questionable practical suggestions. The aim of this article is to (1) unravel this complex issue by differentiating urban phenomena that are usually all labeled as self-organizing; (2) identify which of them is the most challenging for planning theory and practice, and (3) discuss how planning can productively relate to this form of self-organization.
700			_aRauws, Ward _957570
700			_aCozzolino, Stefano _956621
773	0		_08876 _917104 _dLondon Pion Ltd. 2010 _tEnvironment and planning B: planning and design (Urban Analytics and City Science) _x1472-3417
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2399808319857721
942			_2ddc _cEJR
999			_c14505 _d14505