000			01552nab a2200181 4500
003			OSt
005			20230906121211.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			230906b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aKimpton, Anthony _957526
245			_aUpset diagrams for examining whether parking maximums influence modal choice and car holdings/
260			_bSage, _c2020.
300			_aVol. 52, Issue 6, 2020 ( 1023–1026 p.)
520			_aVenn and Euler diagrams can provide researchers and practitioners with a quick visual summary of information that is relevant for evaluating policy, but given that the potential number of intersections grows exponentially relative to sets of information (2n – 1), diagrams featuring more than three sets of information are typically difficult to interpret from a two-dimensional medium (i.e. reports or articles). In contrast, upset diagrams arrange sets and intersections on a matrix. Thus, the potential number of intersections grows linearly, and further information (e.g. histograms and boxplots) can be aligned vertically or horizontally to this matrix. To demonstrate this application, seven commuter modal choices, two car-parking policies, car holdings and country of birth will be visualised using an upset diagram to evaluate whether a parking-maximums policy reform in Brisbane, Australia, is reducing car ownership and dependence.
773	0		_08877 _917103 _dLondon Pion Ltd. 2010 _tEnvironment and planning A _x1472-3409
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19890871
942			_2ddc _cEJR
999			_c14486 _d14486