000			01743nam a2200205 4500
003			OSt
005			20230904153058.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			230904b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aCalvo, Sara _957454
245			_aThe political institutionalization of the social economy in Ecuador: _bIndigeneity and institutional logics/
260			_bSage, _c2020.
300			_aVol 38, Issue 2, 2020 (269–289 p.)
520			_aHow differing social economy traditions within the global South can combine with state and market sectors to provide alternative development paths has increasingly become a focus of political and policy debate. This paper uses an institutional logics perspective to analyse the interaction between indigenous collective traditions and other institutional logics in Ecuador’s social economy. Results demonstrate how indigenous practice has interacted with other social economy elements to produce novel organizational and institutional forms. Findings from original primary research identify processes of co-existence, accommodation and conflict in the interaction of differing institutional civil society, state and market logics and the institutionalization of the social economy. Critically, processes of conflict generated by contradictory logics have over time helped close down many of the new political spaces, limiting the ongoing inclusion of indigenous institutions and the ability to construct an alternative, pluralistic path to development.
700			_aSyrett, Stephen _957455
700			_aMorales, Andres _957456
773	0		_08872 _917105 _dLondon Pion Ltd. 2010 _tEnvironment and planning C: _x1472-3425
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2399654419857719
942			_2ddc _cEJR
999			_c14467 _d14467