000 | 01888nab a2200193 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20230830174110.0 | ||
007 | cr aa aaaaa | ||
008 | 230830b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
100 |
_aLeffers, Donald _957339 |
||
245 |
_aLand developers as institutional and postpolitical actors: _bSites of power in land use policy and planning/ |
||
260 |
_bSage, _c2020. |
||
300 | _aVol. 52, Issue 2, 2020 ( 318–336 p.) | ||
520 | _aLand developers play an active role as institutional actors that shape the development and governance of urban regions. In this paper, we find that developers not only influence state institutions governing land use, they are place-based actors whose influence is normalized as invited strategic stakeholders in planning exercises. Our analysis highlights the complementarity of institutional and postpolitical theories in offering a nuanced understanding of the multi-faceted and multi-scalar relationships among powerful actors engaged in land development processes. Postpolitical theories highlight the participatory processes of inclusion and exclusion in collaborative-based planning exercises that privilege certain stakeholders and exclude others. Through the lens of institutionalist theory, we move beyond specific land conflicts to focus on the day-to-day interactions and institutionalized roles of key actors, ideas and political influences in shaping contested land policy and outcomes. The analysis is based on multi-year research projects that drew upon interviews, observation and document analysis of key actors’ engagement in initiatives to formulate and implement growth management policies in the Toronto region. | ||
700 |
_aWekerle, Gerda R _957340 |
||
773 | 0 |
_08877 _917103 _dLondon Pion Ltd. 2010 _tEnvironment and planning A _x1472-3409 |
|
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19856628 | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cEJR |
||
999 |
_c14395 _d14395 |