000			01207nab a2200181 4500
003			OSt
005			20230829180248.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			230829b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aCavosk, Aleksandra _957287
245			_aREFIT of the SEA Directive/
260			_bSage, _c2020.
300			_aVol. 22, Issue 2, 2020 ( 108–118 p.)
520			_aThe REFIT evaluation concluded that the SEA Directive still remains fit for purpose. It is successfully applied in different social, economic and administrative settings and it acts as a flexible procedural tool in pursuit of important environmental objectives. Although there are inevitable differences between member states in implementing the Directive, the evaluation exposed some of the common challenges facing all member states in implementing different aspects of the Directive in practice. They include difficulties resulting from the lack of clarity of the Directive’s scope, the timing of the SEA, the preparation of environmental reports and a lack of better public engagement.
773	0		_011304 _917102 _dSage, 2019. _tEnvironmental law review
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1461452920921614
942			_2ddc _cEJR
999			_c14364 _d14364