000			01931nab a2200181 4500
003			OSt
005			20230828163020.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			230828b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aYiannakou, Athena _957183
245			_aUrban regeneration as a perpetual planning process: _bUnderstanding the role of stakeholders in property-led regeneration projects in Greek cities/
260			_bSage, _c2020.
300			_aVol 35, Issue 2, 2020 ( 83–104 p.)
520			_aUrban regeneration has been at the forefront of urban planning and development in European cities for many decades and is strongly connected to property-led development, with the involvement of various stakeholders. In Greece, urban regeneration, as a public policy response to large-scale abandonment and dereliction of urban land, has not been successful so far. The Greek planning system and its provisions for renewal of degraded urban areas have for long been regarded as an obstacle to the implementation of urban regeneration projects. The reform of the planning system in the 2010s introduced some critical changes, with an emphasis on larger-scale development, but with no particular focus on urban regeneration. Using two case studies of regeneration projects in the city of Thessaloniki, this paper attempts to provide an insight into the role of the various stakeholders in such projects. It is argued that in these projects, each stakeholder, irrespective of its character, acts as distinct interest group which develops only binary relations with other stakeholders. Thus, the regeneration project becomes a platform upon which each stakeholder aims to secure its power, instead of a coordinated multi-stakeholder process with a framework for sharing the costs and benefits of its implementation.
773	0		_011252 _917101 _dSage, 2019. _tLocal economy
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0269094220914470
942			_2ddc _cEJR
999			_c14316 _d14316