000 | 01763nab a2200205 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20230821160014.0 | ||
007 | cr aa aaaaa | ||
008 | 230821b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
100 |
_aEck, Emil van _957063 |
||
245 |
_aAmbiguity of diversity: _bManagement of ethnic and class transitions in a gentrifying local shopping street/ |
||
260 |
_bSage, _c2020. |
||
300 | _aVol 57, Issue 16, 2020 ( 3299–3314 p.). | ||
520 | _aAs a malleable concept with a relatively positive resonance, ‘diversity’ proves to be a useful tool to legitimise a range of policy strategies, goals and outcomes. In the Netherlands, the concept has gained a central role in the implementation of social mixing policies targeting so-called problematic neighbourhoods by introducing a better ‘mixed’ or ‘balanced’ population. The discursive celebration of such a mixed neighbourhood, however, often carefully evades the question: ‘A mix of what?’ Closer inspection of policy interventions reveals that the different meanings of diversity are employed to claim urban space for some groups, while excluding others. This is illustrated by a range of micro-management strategies in a shopping street in Amsterdam, Javastraat. Framed as promoting diversity, they form a symbolically loaded strategy to covertly manage ethnic and class transition by targeting the retail landscape. This article explores the (discursive) remaking of the shopping street and the consequences thereof for shopkeepers and local residents. | ||
700 |
_aHagemans, Iris _957064 |
||
700 |
_aRath, Jan _957065 |
||
773 | 0 |
_08843 _916581 _dLondon Sage Publications Ltd. 1964 _tUrban studies _x0042-0980 |
|
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019897008 | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cEJR |
||
999 |
_c14273 _d14273 |