000			01659nab a2200193 4500
003			OSt
005			20230821153840.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			230821b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aHurk, Martijn van den _957056
245			_aContractual arrangements and entrepreneurial governance: _bFlexibility and leeway in urban regeneration projects/
260			_bSage, _c2020.
300			_aVol 57, Issue 16, 2020 ( 3217–3235 p.).
520			_aUrban regeneration projects involve complex contractual deals between public- and private-sector actors. Critics contend that contracts hamper opportunities for flexibility and change in these projects due to strict provisions that are incorporated in legal agreements. This article offers contrary empirical insights based on a study of contractual arrangements for urban regeneration projects in the Netherlands, including an analysis of interviews and confidential documents. It zooms in on provisions on safeguarding and adaptation, finding that urban regeneration projects remain receptive to flexibility and change. Public-sector actors use their room to manoeuvre while operating contracts, seeking to secure social relations and keep projects going. This article taps into data sources that are difficult to access, addressing what is included in contracts and how they are used by practitioners, and presents questions for future research on contracts in the urban built environment.
700			_aTasan-Kok, Tuna _951223
773	0		_08843 _916581 _dLondon Sage Publications Ltd. 1964 _tUrban studies _x0042-0980
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019894277
942			_2ddc _cEJR
999			_c14269 _d14269