000			01539nab a2200193 4500
003			OSt
005			20230719162326.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			230719b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aStoker, Robert P. _955999
245			_aObama’s Urban Legacy: _bThe Limits of Braiding and Local Policy Coordination/
260			_bSage, _c2020.
300			_aVol 56, Issue 6, 2020:( 1607-1629 p.).
520			_aWe examine the distribution of selected place-based urban assistance grants provided by the Obama administration to the 50 largest U.S. cities. Our analysis contributes to understanding Obama’s urban legacy by separating planning from implementation grants, distinguishing between policy domains, and acknowledging the limitations of local policy coordination. Facing staunch Congressional opposition to its urban agenda, administration officials encouraged local participants to finance their revitalization projects by braiding (seeking resources from many sources and coordinating and integrating existing federal funding streams locally to create comprehensive, synergistic initiatives). However, braiding was not always successful. Cities struggled to win federal grants in multiple policy domains and to coordinate the use of grants they did win, as braiding made an already difficult process even more demanding and complex.
700			_aRich, Michael J. _956000
773	0		_09296 _916911 _dSage Publications _tUrban Affairs Review
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1078087419849490
942			_2ddc _cEJR
999			_c13863 _d13863