000			01668nab a2200181 4500
003			OSt
005			20230718182453.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			230718b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aMcGovern, Stephen J. _955939
245			_aAnalyzing Urban Politics: _bA Mobilization–Governance Framework/
260			_bSage, _c2020.
300			_a Vol 56, Issue 4, 2020:( 1011-1052 p.).
520			_aThis paper begins by examining recent scholarship on the carceral state and its political consequences as an opportunity to reassess the study of urban politics. Along with illuminating how race structures local power relations, research on the carceral state exposes gaps in the long-standing, political–economy paradigm, and in particular regime theory, concerning the political lives of ordinary people and the role of ideas, values, and ideology in shaping political behavior. At the same time, this paper recognizes the powerful impact of market forces on urban governance, as well as regime theory’s emphasis on organizational resources, intergroup collaboration, and coalition building in accounting for business influence over city policymaking. A new analytical approach is proposed—the mobilization–governance framework—that seeks to build on the insights of scholarship on the carceral state while retaining still-valuable aspects of regime theory. A case study of contemporary politics in Philadelphia is presented to illustrate how the mobilization–governance framework might be applied.
773	0		_09296 _916911 _dSage Publications _tUrban Affairs Review
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1078087418820174
942			_2ddc _cEJR
999			_c13834 _d13834