000 | 01511nab a2200193 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20230718165115.0 | ||
007 | cr aa aaaaa | ||
008 | 230718b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
100 |
_aMorcol, Goktug _955932 |
||
245 |
_aAccountability of Business Improvement District in Urban Governance Networks: _bAn Investigation of State Enabling Laws/ |
||
260 |
_bSage, _c2020. |
||
300 | _aVol 56, Issue 3, 2020:( 888-918 p.). | ||
520 | _a A conceptual framework is proposed to investigate the accountability of business improvement district (BID) in urban governance networks and it is applied in analyses of BID state enabling laws in the United States. The conditions that lead to their emergence and the enhancement of their functions and how BIDs and their accountability issues should be conceptualized are discussed. The multidimensional framework proposed in this study includes political and bureaucratic accountability, transparency, liability, and responsiveness mechanisms. The results of the analyses show that the laws rely primarily on political and bureaucratic control mechanisms and provide some transparency mechanisms. The problems in implementing the bureaucratic and political control mechanisms are elaborated. The implications of the findings for future empirical studies are discussed. | ||
700 |
_aKaragoz, Turgay _955933 |
||
773 | 0 |
_09296 _916911 _dSage Publications _tUrban Affairs Review |
|
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1078087418793532 | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cEJR |
||
999 |
_c13827 _d13827 |