000			01360nab a2200181 4500
003			OSt
005			20230718155959.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			230718b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aShabazian, Ani N. _955922
245			_aVoices That Matter: _bChief Administrative Officers’ Role in the Student Discipline Gap/
260			_bSage, _c2020.
300			_aVol 55, Issue 1, 2020( 66–94 p.)
520			_aThis study explores how community socioeconomic status (SES), geographical location, and administrator perspectives influence the implementation of exclusionary disciplinary policies. Using Geographical Information Systems mapping technology, in-depth interviewing, and document analysis, this study finds that schools located in high SES sectors have higher rates of exclusionary disciplinary practices, whereas schools located in low SES sectors have lower levels. The findings also indicate five normative values that influence leadership’s decisions to exclude students more frequently. These guiding belief systems include productive efficiency, equality versus equity, the potential of legal liability, prescribing to a cultural deficit ideology, and the notion of strict surveillance.
773	0		_010959 _916913 _dSage, 2019. _tUrban education
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916651319
942			_2ddc _cEJR
999			_c13820 _d13820