000			01421nab a2200193 4500
003			OSt
005			20230720151122.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			230718b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aFaw, Leah _955918
245			_aPoor Choices: _bThe Sociopolitical Context of “Grand Theft Education”/
260			_bSage, _c2020.
300			_aVol 55, Issue 1, 2020( 3-37 p.)
520			_aIn recent years, districts have paid special attention to the common practice of “district hopping,” families bending geographic school assignment rules by sending a child to a school in a district where the child does not formally reside—usually to a district that is more desirable because of higher performing schools or greater educational resources. In several high-profile cases, mothers who engaged in district hopping were charged with “grand theft” of educational services. By situating these cases in the broader context of market-based reforms, we refocus attention on the responses of districts rather than the actions of parents. We argue that increased privatization of education and growing dominance of a “private-goods” model of schooling create the conditions necessary for framing these actions as “theft.”
700			_aJabbar, Huriya _955919
773	0		_010959 _916913 _dSage, 2019. _tUrban education
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916651322
942			_2ddc _cEJR
999			_c13818 _d13818