000 | 01350nab a2200193 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20230717161828.0 | ||
007 | cr aa aaaaa | ||
008 | 230717b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
100 |
_aCrowder-Meyer, Melody _955843 |
||
245 | _aVoting Can Be Hard, Information Helps/ | ||
300 | _aVol 56, Issue 1, 2020:( 124-153 p.). | ||
520 | _aMany U.S. elections provide voters with precious little information about candidates on the ballot. In local contests, party labels are often absent. In primary elections, party labels are not useful. Indeed, much of the time, voters have only the name of the candidate to go by. In these contexts, how do voters make decisions? Using several experiments, we find that voters use candidates’ race, ethnicity, and gender as cues for whom to support—penalizing candidates of color and benefiting women. But we also demonstrate that providing even a small amount of information to voters—such as candidate occupation—virtually erases the effects of candidate demographics on voter behavior, even among voters with high levels of racial and gender prejudice. | ||
700 |
_aGadarian, Shana Kushner _955844 |
||
700 |
_aTrounstine, Jessica _955845 |
||
773 | 0 |
_09296 _916911 _dSage Publications _tUrban Affairs Review |
|
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1078087419831074 | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cEJR |
||
999 |
_c13781 _d13781 |