000			01668nab a22001937a 4500
003			OSt
005			20230330144109.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			230321b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_c
100			_aPailey, Robtel Neajai _955221
245			_aDe-centring the ‘White Gaze’ of Development/
260			_bWiley, _c2020.
300			_aVol 51, issue 3, 2020 : (729-745 p.).
520			_aIn its crudest form, development has traditionally been about dissecting the political, socio-economic and cultural processes of black, brown and other subjects of colour in the so-called global South and finding them regressive, particularly in comparison to the so-called progressive global North. However, in the midst of a 21st century, de-colonial scholarly pivot, ‘opening up development’ fundamentally demands turning the colonial, ‘white gaze’ on its head. In particular, contemporary social media movements challenging white supremacy such as #BlackLivesMatter have gained prominence while non-white development actors such as China have emerged as enticing alternatives. These phenomena have pried open development with both positive and negative results, intended and unintended consequences. This article seeks to put Critical Development Studies into fluid conversation with Critical Race Studies in an examination of how scholars, policy makers and practitioners have simultaneously succeeded and failed in subverting the ‘white gaze’ of development.
773	0		_08737 _916865 _dWest Sussex John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 1970 _tDevelopment and change _x0012-155X
856			_u https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12550
942			_2ddc _cART
999			_c13592 _d13592