000			01547nab a2200229 4500
003			OSt
005			20220804150549.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			220804b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aAnstis, Stuart _951105
245			_aMisperceived Positions of Interlaced Fingers
260			_bsage _c2019
300			_aVol 48, Issue 9, 2019 : (892-896 p.).
520			_aInterlacing one’s fingers can cause misperception of finger positions. Observer’s (O’s) fingers were interlaced in six different ways and experimenter (E) tapped two adjacent fingers in quick succession (e.g., tapping the right middle finger then the left ring finger). O had to state the perceived direction in which the tapping occurred, and errors were recorded. When hands were well separated, touching two adjacent fingers of one hand gave error rates of only 2.4%, and touching a finger on one hand then the other gave error rates of only 3.4%. Interlacing the fingers as if in prayer increased error rates to 9%. When hands were superimposed with finger pointing away from O’s body, error rates rose further to 30%. Observers knew which fingers were which, but they were confused about exactly where their fingers were. Thus, somatotopic was greatly superior to spatiotopic localization.
650			_atouch, _948945
650			_ahaptic, _949595
650			_aillusions, _950562
650			_afingers _949356
773	0		_012374 _916462 _dSage, _tPerception _x1468-4233
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0301006619865478
942			_2ddc _cART
999			_c12722 _d12722