000			01772nab a2200265 4500
003			OSt
005			20220803112520.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			220721b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aStothart, Cary _949322
245			_aWhat to Where: The Right Attention Set for the Wrong Location/
260			_bsage _c2019
300			_aVol 48, Issue 7, 2019: (602-615 p.).
520			_aOne of the strongest predictors of whether or not an object in our environment captures our attention is the similarity between that object’s features and those we have prioritized—our attention set. For example, in inattentional blindness tasks, people are more likely to notice an unexpected white shape when tracking white objects than when tracking black objects. These attention sets are assumed to operate globally, enhancing perception of the critical feature across the entire visual field. We tested this assumption in four inattentional blindness experiments. Although observers were more likely to notice a white unexpected object when tracking white shapes, the effect of the participant’s attention set was substantially smaller or absent for objects appearing beyond the attended region. This result challenges the idea that attention sets help guide attention to relevant objects appearing in otherwise unattended regions.
650			_avisual attention, _949323
650			_a attention set, _949324
650			_aspatial attention, _949325
650			_aattention capture, _949326
650			_ainattentional blindness _949327
700			_aSimons, Daniel J. _949328
700			_a Boot, Walter R. _949329
773	0		_012374 _916462 _dSage, _tPerception _x1468-4233
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0301006619854302
942			_2ddc _cART
999			_c12439 _d12439