000			02148nab a22002897a 4500
003			OSt
005			20220801204435.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			220719b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_a Legacy, Crystal _949067
245			_aBeyond the post-political: _b Exploring the relational and situated dynamics of consensus and conflict in planning/
260			_bSage, _c2019.
300			_aVol 18, Issue 3, 2019 : (273-281 p.).
520			_aThis Special Issue explores the problematique of the consensus and conflict binary that has emerged in the critical analysis of the post-political urban condition. Focusing on the interstitial spaces existing between consensus and conflict reveals a more relational dynamic that positions consensus and conflict as co-constitutive and continuously being shaped by the performance of politics by state and non-state actors. Critiques of the post-political tend to fail to engage with the conditions that lead to citizen actors acting in political ways beyond the formal processes of planning and decision-making, or when consensus or conflict is used by oppressive politics to produce exclusion and reproduce inequality. In addition to introducing the five papers appearing in this special issue, in this opening editorial, we argue the need to cast attention towards the new expressions of political participation generated by different citizen actors. Critically engaging with these varied expressions may reveal new ways of conceptualising participation that can create new informal spaces where injustices and inequalities are voiced and the structures and hegemonies created are exposed.
650			_aconflict, _949068
650			_a consensus, _949069
650			_aMouffe, _949070
650			_aparticipation, _948999
650			_a post-politics, _949071
650			_a Rancière _949072
700			_aMetzger, Jonathan _949073
700			_a Gualini, Enrico _949074
700			_aSteele, Wendy _949075
773	0		_08831 _916470 _dLondon Sage Publications Ltd. 2002 _tPlanning theory _x1473-0952
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219845628
942			_2ddc _cART
999			_c12399 _d12399