000			02074nab a2200265 4500
003			OSt
005			20220801204208.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			220719b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aSkrimizea, Eirini _949019
245			_aOn the ‘complexity turn’ in planning: An adaptive rationale to navigate spaces and times of uncertainty/
260			_bSage, _c2019.
300			_aVol 18, Issue 1, 2019 : (122-142 p.).
520			_aComplexity sciences have been long ago acknowledged to be useful at conceptualizing a variety of phenomena relevant to planning. Nevertheless, the actual mechanisms that will prove adequate to tackle complex planning issues are still under debate. Considering that in today’s so-called era of the Anthropocene such planning issues are more present and evident than ever, the need for further investigating the implications of complexity sciences into building planning approaches becomes very relevant. In this article, we use the concept of complex systems as an analytical framework challenging our understanding of planning and we argue in favour of a ‘complexity turn’ in planning through the adaptive rationale. We define the adaptive rationale as an additional, both normative and analytical, trajectory in planning theory, in the interplay between certainty and uncertainty. Finally, to assimilate this rationale into planning mechanisms capable to respond to contemporary social and ecological challenges, we call for issue-driven adaptive planning approaches conceptualized through normative sustainability and nourished by post-normal science.
650			_aadaptive rationale, _949020
650			_a complex systems, _949021
650			_a normative sustainability _949022
650			_apost-normal science, _949023
650			_auncertainties _949024
700			_aHaniotou, Helene _949025
700			_a Parra, Constanza _949026
773	0		_08831 _916470 _dLondon Sage Publications Ltd. 2002 _tPlanning theory _x1473-0952
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1473095218780515
942			_2ddc _cART
999			_c12391 _d12391