000			01730nab a2200169 4500
999			_c10671 _d10671
003			OSt
005			20201027125837.0
008			201027b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aHendrixson, Anne _931564
245			_aPopulation Control in the Troubled Present: The ‘120 by 20’ Target and Implant Access Program
260			_bJohn Wiley, _c2019
300			_aVol.50, Issue 3,2019:(786-804 p.)
520			_aIn contrast to claims made by some, it is evident from recent, high‐profile family planning programmes that population control is not ‘history’, belonging to some troubled past. Rather, it persists in the troubled present alongside human rights and women's empowerment approaches. To make this argument, this article examines two family planning efforts which emerged from the 2012 London Summit on Family Planning: the ‘120 by 20’ target of Family Planning 2020 (FP2020), and the Implant Access Program (IAP). These examples illustrate population control practices in today's family planning programmes and highlight their serious implications. First, there are shortcomings in conceptualizing population control as largely in the past. Second, the ‘120 by 20’ and IAP examples suggest that FP2020 as a whole merits critical inquiry. Third, FP2020 raises issues of contraceptive safety regarding both the methods promoted and their mass dissemination. Finally, the claim that population control is history blocks productive re‐visioning of sexual and reproductive health and rights for all people as a development priority.
773	0		_08737 _915395 _dWest Sussex John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 1970 _tDevelopment and change _x0012-155X
856			_u https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12423
942			_2ddc _cART