000 | 01660nab a2200253 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c10615 _d10615 |
||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20200915120557.0 | ||
007 | cr aa aaaaa | ||
008 | 200915b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
100 |
_aSimandan, Dragos _930196 |
||
245 | _aBeyond Haraway? Addressing constructive criticisms to the ‘four epistemic gaps’ interpretation of positionality and situated knowledges | ||
260 |
_bSage _c2019 |
||
300 | _aVol 9, Issue 2, 2019:(166-170 p.) | ||
520 | _aThe ‘four epistemic gaps’ interpretation of positionality and situated knowledges developed in the anchor article goes significantly beyond Donna Haraway’s original formulation of the thesis of situated knowledges. It does so by organizing the study of the processes that provincialize and politicize perception and cognition alongside a logical sequence of epistemic gaps that shape the quantity and content of information accessible to different subjectivities. In this contribution, I address four sets of productive tensions and constructive criticisms sparked by the anchor article and highlight how they can help fulfill the promise of a generative research program that engages multiple other voices. | ||
650 |
_acritical social theory _930219 |
||
650 |
_asocial difference _930190 |
||
650 |
_aintersectionality _930200 |
||
650 |
_afeminist and queer epistemologies _930197 |
||
650 |
_aembodied and situated cognition _930220 |
||
650 |
_aDonna Haraway _930215 |
||
773 | 0 |
_010527 _915376 _dSage Publications Ltd., 2019 _tDialogues in human geography. _w(OSt)20840795 _x2043-8214 |
|
856 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2043820619850272 | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cART |