000			01722nab a22002297a 4500
999			_c10597 _d10597
003			OSt
005			20200911144608.0
007			cr aa aaaaa
008			200911b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aJones, Andrew _930115
245			_aNavigating Bulkeley’s challenge on climate politics and human geography
260			_bSage _c2019
300			_aVol 9, Issue 1, 2019:(18-21)
520			_aWhile agreeing with the major tenets of Harriet Bulkeley’s timely and powerful argument for geographers (and social scientists more generally) to engage with climate change, this response raises three provocative challenges that arise from this intervention: the degree to which the epistemological and theoretical bases to these arguments are radical, the nature of the engagement problem in the discipline and, perhaps most importantly, how these arguments can be translated to a ‘progressive politics’. The response argues that there is much further to go in explaining the utility of socio-natural understanding of climate change if those beyond the social sciences and in the wider realm of policy and politics are to be convinced of the power of the approach being advocated. It also argues that geographers are well-positioned to develop the bolder and more interdisciplinary approach needed to achieve the kind of ambitious shift in thinking Bulkeley seeks.
650			_aclimate change _929611
650			_aradical theory _930116
650			_aprogressive politics _930117
650			_anature/society _930118
773	0		_010527 _915376 _dSage Publications Ltd., 2019 _tDialogues in human geography. _w(OSt)20840795 _x2043-8214
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2043820619829921
942			_2ddc _cART