Poor Choices: The Sociopolitical Context of “Grand Theft Education”/
Material type:data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9713/a9713a12fcd75a7db52924faf299bd6ec865abdd" alt="Article"
Item type | Current library | Collection | Vol info | Status | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Library, SPAB | Reference Collection | Vol. 55(1-10),2020 | Available |
In recent years, districts have paid special attention to the common practice of “district hopping,” families bending geographic school assignment rules by sending a child to a school in a district where the child does not formally reside—usually to a district that is more desirable because of higher performing schools or greater educational resources. In several high-profile cases, mothers who engaged in district hopping were charged with “grand theft” of educational services. By situating these cases in the broader context of market-based reforms, we refocus attention on the responses of districts rather than the actions of parents. We argue that increased privatization of education and growing dominance of a “private-goods” model of schooling create the conditions necessary for framing these actions as “theft.”
There are no comments on this title.