Ash and Garcia on bump stocks/
Material type:
ArticlePublication details: sage, 2020.Description: Vol 10, issue 3, 2020 : (374–377 p.)Online resources:
In:
Dialogues in human geographySummary: This commentary is a response to James Ash’s ‘Flat Ontology and Geography’, one of the first serious efforts to make use of the philosophy of Tristan Garcia for social science purposes. After reviewing some key distinctions between different kinds of flat ontology, I suggest that both Ash and Garcia make a step forward while failing to strike the desired balance between interconnected networks and autonomous units.
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Vol info | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E-Journal
|
Library, SPAB | Vol. 10 No.1-3 (2020) | Available |
Total holds: 0
This commentary is a response to James Ash’s ‘Flat Ontology and Geography’, one of the first serious efforts to make use of the philosophy of Tristan Garcia for social science purposes. After reviewing some key distinctions between different kinds of flat ontology, I suggest that both Ash and Garcia make a step forward while failing to strike the desired balance between interconnected networks and autonomous units.
There are no comments on this title.
Log in to your account to post a comment.