Reform and resistance: The political economy of land and planning reform in Kenya (Record no. 13266)
[ view plain ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 02457nab a2200181 4500 |
005 - DATE & TIME | |
control field | 20221004120215.0 |
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
fixed length control field | 221004b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Bassett, Ellen |
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | Reform and resistance: The political economy of land and planning reform in Kenya |
Statement of responsibility | Ellen Bassett |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
Place of publication, distribution, etc | London: |
Name of publisher, distributor, etc | Sage, |
Date of publication, distribution, etc | 2020. |
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
Pages | Vol 57, issue 6, 2020: (1164–1183 p.) |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc | In August 2010, Kenyans voted to adopt a new Constitution. Amongst its many provisions was devolved governance, which established 47 independent counties each led by a directly elected governor and legislative assembly. The Constitution also sought to address the country’s ‘land question’ by radically reworking land institutions and administration. The Constitution introduced an independent body, the National Land Commission, empowered to oversee public land management and allocation. Constitutional provisions devolved significant powers and responsibilities in land management and planning to the county level. These reforms – stressing transparency, accountability and greater community participation in land planning and administration – were intended to halt endemic corruption at the Ministry of Lands, address land injustices, enhance tenure security, and facilitate better-functioning land markets. This paper examines the unfolding institutional reform around land pursuant to the 2010 Constitution. It explores the political economy of land in Kenya by examining incentives for and impediments to institutional change toward better land management and long sought-after land justice. As with many reforms adopted throughout the Global South, Kenya’s land reforms were premised on ‘getting the incentives right’. Incentivising behaviour is extremely complicated in a sector as complex, dynamic and profitable as the land sector. The research highlights the role of urban planners, actors rarely examined in the literature on Kenya’s land politics. Kenya’s faltering land reform is a result of the internal conflicting incentives of land actors and the fact that no legal reform will be sufficient to alter entrenched behaviour without renewed pressure from a broad-based land justice/human rights movement.<br/> |
773 0# - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
Host Biblionumber | 8843 |
Host Itemnumber | 16581 |
Place, publisher, and date of publication | London Sage Publications Ltd. 1964 |
Title | Urban studies |
International Standard Serial Number | 0042-0980 |
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
Uniform Resource Identifier | https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019829366 |
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
Koha item type | Articles |
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
-- | 53756 |
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
-- | ddc |
No items available.