Transfer-based decentralisation, economic growth and spatial inequality: Evidence from China’s 2002–2003 tax sharing reform (Record no. 13224)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02219nab a2200217 4500
005 - DATE & TIME
control field 20221003110637.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 221003b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Fan, Fan
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Transfer-based decentralisation, economic growth and spatial inequality: Evidence from China’s 2002–2003 tax sharing reform
Statement of responsibility Fan Fan
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication, distribution, etc London:
Name of publisher, distributor, etc Sage,
Date of publication, distribution, etc 2020.
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Pages Vol 57, issue 4, 2020: (806–826 p.)
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc China has adopted a transfer-based fiscal decentralisation scheme since the mid-1990s. In the 1994 tax sharing reform, the central government significantly raised its share of government revenue vis-à-vis local governments by taking most of the newly created value-added tax on manufacturing. One aim for the adoption of the transfer-based fiscal scheme was to channel more funds to less developed regions and rural areas, and to alleviate growing interregional inequality and urban–rural income disparity. In 2002 and 2003 the Chinese central government further grabbed 50% and 60%, respectively, of the income taxes previously assigned only to local governments while providing more fiscal transfers to the country’s poor regions and the countryside. Utilising the 2002–2003 change in China’s central–local tax sharing regime as an exogenous policy shock, we employ a Simulated Instrumental Variable approach to causally evaluate the effects of the policy shock on growth, interregional inequality and urban–rural disparity. We find the lower local tax share dis-incentivised local governments and led to lower growth. Although higher central transfers helped to reduce interregional inequalities in per capita GDP and per capita income, the equalising effects were only present for urban incomes. We argue that transfer-based decentralisation without bottom-up accountability was detrimental to economic growth and had limited impact on income redistribution.
700 ## - Added Entry Personal Name
Added Entry Personal Name Li, Ming
700 ## - Added Entry Personal Name
Added Entry Personal Name Tao, Ran
700 ## - Added Entry Personal Name
Added Entry Personal Name Yang, Dali
773 0# - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Host Biblionumber 8843
Host Itemnumber 16581
Place, publisher, and date of publication London Sage Publications Ltd. 1964
Title Urban studies
International Standard Serial Number 0042-0980
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019856780
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Articles
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
-- 53605
700 ## - Added Entry Personal Name
-- 53606
700 ## - Added Entry Personal Name
-- 53607
700 ## - Added Entry Personal Name
-- 53608
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
-- ddc

No items available.

Library, SPA Bhopal, Neelbad Road, Bhauri, Bhopal By-pass, Bhopal - 462 030 (India)
Ph No.: +91 - 755 - 2526805 | E-mail: library@spabhopal.ac.in

OPAC best viewed in Mozilla Browser in 1366X768 Resolution.
Free counter