How Much Spatial Information Is Lost in the Sensory Substitution Process? Comparing Visual, Tactile, and Auditory Approaches/ (Record no. 12513)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02231nab a2200265 4500 |
| 005 - DATE & TIME | |
| control field | 20220803120524.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 220722b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Richardson, Michael |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | How Much Spatial Information Is Lost in the Sensory Substitution Process? Comparing Visual, Tactile, and Auditory Approaches/ |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
| Name of publisher, distributor, etc | sage |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc | 2019 |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Pages | Vol: 48, issue: 11, 2019: (1079-1103 p.). |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc | Sensory substitution devices (SSDs) can convey visuospatial information through spatialised auditory or tactile stimulation using wearable technology. However, the level of information loss associated with this transformation is unknown. In this study, novice users discriminated the location of two objects at 1.2 m using devices that transformed a 16 × 8-depth map into spatially distributed patterns of light, sound, or touch on the abdomen. Results showed that through active sensing, participants could discriminate the vertical position of objects to a visual angle of 1°, 14°, and 21°, and their distance to 2 cm, 8 cm, and 29 cm using these visual, auditory, and haptic SSDs, respectively. Visual SSDs significantly outperformed auditory and tactile SSDs on vertical localisation, whereas for depth perception, all devices significantly differed from one another (visual > auditory > haptic). Our findings highlight the high level of acuity possible for SSDs even with low spatial resolutions (e.g., 16 × 8) and quantify the level of information loss attributable to this transformation for the SSD user. Finally, we discuss ways of closing this “modality gap” found in SSDs and conclude that this process is best benchmarked against performance with SSDs that return to their primary modality (e.g., visuospatial into visual). |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| Subject | sensory substitution, |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| Subject | spatial perception, |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| Subject | hearing, |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| Subject | touch, |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| Subject | vision |
| 700 ## - Added Entry Personal Name | |
| Added Entry Personal Name | Thar, Jan |
| 700 ## - Added Entry Personal Name | |
| Added Entry Personal Name | Alvarez, James |
| 773 0# - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Host Biblionumber | 12374 |
| Host Itemnumber | 16462 |
| Place, publisher, and date of publication | Sage, |
| Title | Perception |
| International Standard Serial Number | 1468-4233 |
| 856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006619873194 |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Koha item type | Articles |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| -- | 49779 |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| -- | 49780 |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| -- | 49781 |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| -- | 49782 |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| -- | 48945 |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| -- | 49315 |
| 700 ## - Added Entry Personal Name | |
| -- | 49783 |
| 700 ## - Added Entry Personal Name | |
| -- | 49784 |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| -- | ddc |
No items available.