Fixing the ecosystem: Conservation, crisis and capital in Rwanda's Gishwati Forest/ (Record no. 12449)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02965nab a2200253 4500
005 - DATE & TIME
control field 20220802150333.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 220721b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Clay, Nathan
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Fixing the ecosystem: Conservation, crisis and capital in Rwanda's Gishwati Forest/
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Name of publisher, distributor, etc Sage,
Date of publication, distribution, etc 2019.
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Pages Vol 2, issue 1, 2019 : (23-46 p.).
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc Conservation-development projects are increasingly enacted across large expanses of land where human livelihoods hang in the balance. Recent initiatives–often called ‘landscape approaches’ or ‘ecosystem-based’ conservation–aim to achieve economic development and conservation goals through managing hybrid spaces. I argue that the landscape/ecosystem approach is a socioecological fix: an effort to resolve social-environmental crises through sinking capital (financial, natural, and social) into an imagined ecosystem. Rwanda’s Gishwati Forest has been the locus of diverse crises and fixes over the past 40 years, including an industrial forestry and dairy project, a refugee settlement, a privately managed chimpanzee sanctuary, a carbon sequestration platform, and, most recently, an “integrated silvo-pastoral conservation landscape.” This paper considers how these governance schemes have intersected with broader processes of agrarian change to generate crises that subsequent conservation/development projects then attempt to resolve. I demonstrate how visions for ecosystems privilege certain forms of governance around which imagined socioecological histories are mobilized to frame problems and legitimize certain solutions, technologies, and actors. The Gishwati ecosystem and its fixes are repeatedly defined through an imaginary of crisis and degradation that engenders large-scale landscape modification while foreclosing reflection about root causes of crises or how these might be addressed. Thus, even while conservation/development paradigms have shifted over the past 40 years (from separating people and nature to integrating them in conservation landscapes), this crisis-fix metabolism has consistently generated livelihood insecurity for the tens of thousands of people living in and around Gishwati. Imagining and enacting more just and inclusive social-environmental landscapes will require making space for diverse voices to define ecosystem form and function as well as addressing deeply rooted power imbalances that are at the heart of recurrent crises.
650 ## - Subject
Subject Conservation,
650 ## - Subject
Subject development,
650 ## - Subject
Subject ecosystem approach,
650 ## - Subject
Subject landscape approach,
650 ## - Subject
Subject neoliberalization,
650 ## - Subject
Subject socioecological fix
773 0# - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Host Biblionumber 12446
Host Itemnumber 16479
Place, publisher, and date of publication London: Sage Publication Ltd, 2019.
Title Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space/
International Standard Serial Number 25148486
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848619826576
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Articles
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
-- 49393
650 ## - Subject
-- 48015
650 ## - Subject
-- 49394
650 ## - Subject
-- 49395
650 ## - Subject
-- 49396
650 ## - Subject
-- 49397
650 ## - Subject
-- 49398
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
-- ddc

No items available.

Library, SPA Bhopal, Neelbad Road, Bhauri, Bhopal By-pass, Bhopal - 462 030 (India)
Ph No.: +91 - 755 - 2526805 | E-mail: library@spabhopal.ac.in

OPAC best viewed in Mozilla Browser in 1366X768 Resolution.
Free counter