Perceptual Errors Support the Notion of Masking by Object Substitution/ (Record no. 12405)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02140nab a2200253 4500 |
| 005 - DATE & TIME | |
| control field | 20220803105751.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 220719b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Pilling, Michael |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Perceptual Errors Support the Notion of Masking by Object Substitution/ |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
| Name of publisher, distributor, etc | sage |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc | 2019 |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Pages | Vol 48, Issue 2, 2019: (138-161 p.). |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc | Two experiments examined the effect of object substitution masking (OSM) on the perceptual errors in reporting the orientation of a target. In Experiment 1, a four-dot trailing mask was compared with a simultaneous-noise mask. In Experiment 2, the four-dot and noise masks were factorially varied. Responses were modelled using a mixture regression model and Bayesian inference to deduce whether the relative impacts of OSM on guessing and precision were the same as those of a noise mask, and thus whether the mechanism underpinning OSM is based on increasing noise rather than a substitution process. Across both experiments, OSM was associated with an increased guessing rate when the mask trailed target offset and a reduction in the precision of the target representation (although the latter was less reliable across the two experiments). Importantly, the noise mask also influenced both guessing and precision, but in a different manner, suggesting that OSM is not simply caused by increasing noise. In Experiment 2, the effects of OSM and simultaneous-noise interacted, suggesting the two manipulations involve common mechanisms. Overall results suggest that OSM is often a consequence of a substitution process, but there is evidence that the mask increases noise levels on trials where substitution does not occur. |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| Subject | object substitution masking, |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| Subject | error distributions, |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| Subject | Bayesian mixed-models analysis, |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| Subject | attentional gating |
| 700 ## - Added Entry Personal Name | |
| Added Entry Personal Name | Guest, Duncan |
| 700 ## - Added Entry Personal Name | |
| Added Entry Personal Name | Andrews, Mark |
| 773 0# - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Host Biblionumber | 12374 |
| Host Itemnumber | 16462 |
| Place, publisher, and date of publication | Sage, |
| Title | Perception |
| International Standard Serial Number | 1468-4233 |
| 856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006619825782 |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Koha item type | Articles |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| -- | 49104 |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| -- | 49105 |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| -- | 49106 |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| -- | 49107 |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| -- | 49108 |
| 700 ## - Added Entry Personal Name | |
| -- | 49109 |
| 700 ## - Added Entry Personal Name | |
| -- | 49110 |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| -- | ddc |
No items available.