Innovation in the Periphery: A Critical Survey and Research Agenda (Record no. 11133)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02188nab a2200241 4500 |
| 005 - DATE & TIME | |
| control field | 20210113114933.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 210113b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Eder, Jakob |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Innovation in the Periphery: A Critical Survey and Research Agenda |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
| Name of publisher, distributor, etc | Sage, |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc | 2019. |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Pages | Vol 42, Issue 2, 2019(119-146 p.) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc | Scholars of the geography of innovation have produced an impressive body of literature over the last decades. However, until recently this research focused on successful core regions, implicitly assuming that there is no innovation in peripheral areas. This view is being increasingly questioned, which is reflected by a rising number of papers, special issues, and edited volumes on innovation outside of agglomerations. Hence, this rapidly emerging field calls for a critical survey. In order to identify a future research agenda, this article conducts a systematic literature review of the work on innovation in the periphery (1960–2016). As such, it explores the recurring themes and key issues of the field and discusses the various periphery concepts applied, ranging from a geographic to a functional perspective on various scales. In doing so, it outlines options for policy makers and suggests avenues for future research: first, the periphery concept needs more refinement. Second, future studies should include systematic comparisons of regions. Third, an evolutionary perspective might provide new insights. Fourth, future work could explore the benefits peripheries offer for certain kinds of innovation. Fifth, urban–rural linkages might be of higher relevance than assumed. Sixth, research should go beyond the well-known examples. Finally, the analysis could be extended by applying a broader understanding of innovation. |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| Subject | innovation, |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| Subject | innovation policy, |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| Subject | periphery, |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| Subject | proximity, |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| Subject | regional development |
| 773 0# - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Host Biblionumber | 11129 |
| Host Itemnumber | 15490 |
| Place, publisher, and date of publication | Sage, 2019. |
| Title | International regional science review |
| 856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017618764279 |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Koha item type | Articles |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| -- | 39924 |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| -- | 39925 |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| -- | 39926 |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| -- | 39927 |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| -- | 39928 |
| 650 ## - Subject | |
| -- | 39929 |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| -- | ddc |
No items available.